Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
Date
Msg-id 15537.1516200157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()  (Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de>)
Responses Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
List pgsql-hackers
Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de> writes:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-17 <f18403d3-278c-a4fa-e1f5-6b9a90ca077c@2ndquadrant.com>
>> So what is the next action this thread?  I think --with-extra-version is
>> the right solution for packagers, so I'm tempted to close this commit
>> fest item.  There is some speculation that using it could break
>> third-party tools, but (a) we would need more concrete evidence, (b) we
>> should fix *that* then, and (c) it's likely unavoidable in general.

> If you think I should use that for the packages in Debian and on
> apt.postgresql.org, I can do that. I just fear it will explode
> in all sorts of ways...

Well, do that and see ;-).

IMO there's not really any evidence that we need an additional mechanism
in this space.  I don't see any way to get that evidence unless some
packager tries to use the existing mechanism and hits insurmountable
problems.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Geoff Winkless
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()