Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Hm, I'm not quite convinced by this. Seems to make testing a bunch of
>> codepaths harder. I think it's fine to say that pg doesn't work
>> correctly with them disabled though.
> I'm not sure I understand this. Do you mean we should just add a
> disclaimer to the documentation?
What I didn't understand about it was what kind of testing this'd make
harder. If we desupport dynamic_shared_memory_type=none, there aren't
any code paths that need to cope with the case, and we should just
remove any code that thereby becomes unreachable.
regards, tom lane
