Re: Union test case broken in make check? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Union test case broken in make check?
Date
Msg-id 15055.1258696160@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Union test case broken in make check?  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: Union test case broken in make check?
List pgsql-hackers
Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> writes:
> Without an order by, the order is not defined.

Yeah, but with the same data and the same software it should generally
give the same result; as evidenced by the fact that these same
regression tests have worked for most people for years.  There's
something odd happening on Emmanuel's machine.  Maybe he's changed
the hashing algorithms or some planner cost parameters?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning