Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 14b4028bf1ad4f4ae829bba13002420d@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> I'm really not in favor of having comments in the conf file that try to
> tell you about stuff you might want to set, much less why.  That task
> properly belongs to some kind of introductory chapter in the SGML docs.
> Novice DBAs are unlikely even to *find* the config file, let alone look
> inside it, if there's not an introductory chapter telling them about
> Things They Ought To Do.

Ugh, you are heading in the wrong direction. The configuration file
should be well documented: moving the documentation further away
from it is the wrong idea, especially if it means firing up a web
browser to do so. As link is fine, and recommended, but a "bare"
configuration file would be far, far worse than the mess we have today.
I like Josh B's version a lot. It's not perfect (I'd add a URL for
each config for example), but it's a great start. Text space is cheap, and having
a consistent, well-documented, easy-to-read conf file is something
worth shooting for.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200808191511
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkirGyEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgsvwCdH6Hb4KOj47j/Zceb26FgEQUM
J2gAoKE19rLhMpgP17EdJIuUVoKQ7H3u
=//eH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf