Re: pg_get_domaindef - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_get_domaindef
Date
Msg-id 14613.1169703221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_get_domaindef  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_get_domaindef
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... convincing use-case that will justify the maintenance load we
>> are setting up for ourselves.  "Somebody might want this" is not
>> adequate.

> I realize it is problem to have the function in two places in our code,
> but if we don't make a user-accessible version, every application has to
> roll their own version and update it for our system catalog changes.

Nope, wrong, you are assuming the conclusion.  Exactly which apps have
to have this?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_domaindef
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_domaindef