Hi,
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 22:17 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> It kind of sounds like tool useful for implementing slave-to-master
> promotion (but both-ways). And, given by tool's parameters, at least
> one "data directory" needs to be local.
>
> Thus I would bet it does not make sense to have this tool installed
> without server package.
Good point, so then we will need to move pg_basebackup,
pg_archivecleanup, pg_receivexlog, etc, to the server package, right?
I'd like to include only the core-server related tools in that
subpackage.
Jeff, what do you think?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
