Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id 142a230c-4fb5-317b-438a-ee5390873059@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/24/17 10:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Tom is correct here. They are not a net win for the average user. We
> tend to forget that although we collectively have a lot of enterprise
> installs where this does matter, we collectively do not equal near the
> level of average user installs.
>
> From an advocacy perspective, the average user install is the one that
> we tend most because that tending (in theory) will grow something that
> is more fruitful e.g; the enterprise install over time because we
> constantly and consistently provided a reasonable and expected
> experience to the average user.

I'm not completely grokking your second paragraph, but I would think 
that an average user would love got get a heads-up that their hardware 
is failing.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.