Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From wambacher
Subject Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)
Date
Msg-id 1425638655239-5840781.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)
List pgsql-general
Karsten Hilbert wrote
> Of course, I am
> not suggesting you provide 48GB of swap and your problem is
> magically solved _but_ one thing we might take away from that
> old adage is that one might "hope things to work better"
> (say, while debugging) if there is at least as much swap as
> there is physical RAM based on the naive assumption that in
> this case '"everything" can be swapped out'.

no problem at all, got TBytes of free Diskpace.




--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/autovacuum-worker-running-amok-and-me-too-tp5840299p5840781.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)
Next
From: pinker
Date:
Subject: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size