Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Date
Msg-id 14109.1475186002@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> Oops. Are you using gcc to see that? I compiled with clang and on
> Windows without noticing it.

Peter already noted that you'd only see it on platforms that define
PG_FLUSH_DATA_WORKS.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument"