Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? ) - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From gmb
Subject Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? )
Date
Msg-id 1408304846514-5815126.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? )  (gmb <gmbouwer@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? )  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Something else I intended to ask in the original post, but forgot:

What effect , if any , will the autovacuum setting have in this type of
scenario ? 
Will performance be improved by disabling this ?
I assume that a vacuum process will be required on at least the pg_catalog
due to dropping of temp tables during the process.

Regards

gmb



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/High-memory-usage-performance-issue-temp-tables-tp5815108p5815126.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: gmb
Date:
Subject: Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? )
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: High memory usage / performance issue ( temp tables ? )