Re: ITYM DROP TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ITYM DROP TABLE
Date
Msg-id 1407.1308071070@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ITYM DROP TABLE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: ITYM DROP TABLE
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Done that way (9.0 and beyond).

Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
problem: the following sentence says
      It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>      overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.

which was okay when "it" referred to "ALTER TABLE", but now that there
are two commands mentioned in the previous sentence, it doesn't match.
Perhaps "These commands also avoid the ...".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Creager
Date:
Subject: Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost