Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 14 13:04:30 -0400 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Done that way (9.0 and beyond).
>
> Re-reading the actual commit, I notice that there's now a grammatical
> problem: the following sentence says
>
> It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
> overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
>
> which was okay when "it" referred to "ALTER TABLE", but now that there
> are two commands mentioned in the previous sentence, it doesn't match.
> Perhaps "These commands also avoid the ...".
Yeah, fixed.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
