Re: Code for user-defined type - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Paul Jones
Subject Re: Code for user-defined type
Date
Msg-id 1401379480.24596.YahooMailNeo@web161704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgresql 9.2.4 - timezone error  (Bhushan Pathak <bhushan.pathak02@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Code for user-defined type
Re: Code for user-defined type
List pgsql-general
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
> 2014-05-27 20:30 GMT+02:00 Paul Jones <pbj@cmicdo.com>:
>
> > I have written a user-defined type that allows direct import and printing
> > of
> > DB2 timestamps.It does correctly import and export DB2 timestamps,
> > butI'm wondering ifsomeone could tell me if I made anymistakes in
> > the C code, particularly w.r.t. memory leaks or non-portableconstructs.
> >
> >
> > I'm doing this on 9.3.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> There is one issue DirectFunctionCall takes a parameters converted to Datum
> and returns Datum
>
> You should to use a macros XGetDatum and DatumGetX
>
> In this case
>
>         newDate = DatumGetTimestamp(DirectFunctionCall2(to_timestamp,
>                                      CStringGetDatum(date_txt),
> CStringGetDatum(cstring_to_text(nls_date_format))));
>
>                 PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(newDate);
>
>
>
> There is inconsistency in types - Timestamp and Timestamptz -

Thanks, Pavel!

I used the proper XGetDatum and DatumGetX and was able to get it to work
properly.  However, I since discovered that I probably should not use
"cstring_to_text" because of the palloc's it does.  The problem comes
when doing "\copy table from file".  After about 1000 rows, the backend
dies with SEGV, I think because of too many pallocs being created in
the copy transaction.

I rewrote it so that the format string is turned into a text at .so load time,
and then converted the input string into a local text.

PJ


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kalai R
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql service stopped automatically after restart
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Code for user-defined type