"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, my perception of that has always been "it needs to be upgraded or
>> removed". So if D'Arcy wants to work on the improvement angle, I have
>> no problem with him doing so. The thing we need to negotiate is "how
>> much improvement is needed to keep it in core".
> Well, the patch I submitted is definitely an improvement over the
> existing version. Are you saying that I have to make further
> improvements before these ones can be imported?
I didn't say that. I was responding to someone whose position seemed to
be "money is going to be removed, therefore you shouldn't work on it".
I wanted to know exactly what would need to be fixed before they'd not
want it removed.
regards, tom lane
