On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 08:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> > but I am looking for, so in early next versions some interesting bgworkers
> > will be in core - scheduler, idle connection killer, multi CPU sorter, ...
> -1 for that. Those bgworkers things satisfy very specific needs (I
> implemented one of them in the list). I'd rather see a wiki page
> listing them properly and let each implementer maintain their code.
>
Completely agree with Michael. I see them just like FDWs. We don't add
some FDW in the core. Some are contrib modules, some are available
elsewhere. BgWorkers should be handled the same way.
> > So I am thinking, it should be marked as "other" feature this year.
> +1 for that. Dynamic background workers is a hacker feature.
+1
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
