Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: The question about the type numeric - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From amulsul
Subject Re: The question about the type numeric
Date
Msg-id 1397638585996-5800219.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to The question about the type numeric  ("sure.postgres" <sure.postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
>But the sign is 0.
>So is there anything wrong?
have look in src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c @ 154 & 155 for POS & NEG
defination given as154 #define NUMERIC_POS                     0x0000155 #define NUMERIC_NEG
0x4000

Regards,
Amul Sul



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/The-question-about-the-type-numeric-tp5800180p5800219.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?