On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, if you want to consider python 2.3 as supported, I have a buildfarm
> machine I am about to put online that has 2.3 on it. If I spin it up with
> python enabled, I expect you to see to it that it starts passing. If you
> won't do that, I'm going to change the documentation.
As I said, according to my testing, 2.3 is supported. If your
experience is different, then please submit a reproducible bug report.
> As for 2.4 vs 2.5, I don't have a lot of faith that we're really
> supporting anything that's not represented in the buildfarm...
There are many other features that the build farm doesn't test and that
I don't have a lot of faith in, but I'm not proposing to remove those.
I don't control what the build farm tests, I only control my own work.
