Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree?
Date
Msg-id 13927.1323200545@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar dic 06 16:06:57 -0300 2011:
>> Makefile.custom is currently looked for in the source directory.  This
>> tripped me up recently when doing a vpath build.  Should it be looked
>> for in the build tree instead?  Or both?

> Hmm, interesting question.  When I have used it, I put it in the source
> dir without thinking much about it.  In the builddir it'd be painful I
> think because it'd be gone when the builddir is zapped to do a full
> rebuild (I don't do this often but it does happen from time to time).

Yeah, to the extent that I use vpath builds at all, it's with the
expectation that I can rm -rf the build tree and not lose anything
interesting.  So I'd be sad if the ability to keep Makefile.custom
in the source tree disappeared.

However, I have no objection to looking first in the build tree and
second in the source tree, if you can get it to do that easily.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table