Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-03-11 22:14:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This looks generally sane to me, although I'm not very happy about folding
>> the "$(MKDIR_P) output_iso" call into pg_isolation_regress_check --- that
>> seems weird and unlike the way it's done for the regular regression test
>> case.
> Yea, not super happy about that either - alternatively we could fold it
> into pg_regress.
Yeah, teaching pg_regress to auto-create the --temp-instance directory
seems perfectly sane from here.
regards, tom lane
