Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Date
Msg-id 13840.1489379706@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-03-11 22:14:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This looks generally sane to me, although I'm not very happy about folding
>> the "$(MKDIR_P) output_iso" call into pg_isolation_regress_check --- that
>> seems weird and unlike the way it's done for the regular regression test
>> case.

> Yea, not super happy about that either - alternatively we could fold it
> into pg_regress.

Yeah, teaching pg_regress to auto-create the --temp-instance directory
seems perfectly sane from here.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Allow interrupts on waiting standby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [NOVICE] Why is there a doubtful copyObject call in add_vars_to_targetlist