Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Patrick Dung
Subject Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Date
Msg-id 1379091872.8613.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general



From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk>
Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

* Patrick Dung (patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk) wrote:
>> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.

>What?  That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work.  In
>general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
>it's certainly not required.

I mean the old version and new version would need to take up disk space on the server.
Thus roughly doubled the disk space used.

Thanks,
Patrick


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jay Vee
Date:
Subject: trigger or logging
Next
From: Patrick Dung
Date:
Subject: Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL