Re: Re: Privileges for INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA (was Re: [DOCS] Small clarification in "34.41. schemata") - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Re: Privileges for INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA (was Re: [DOCS] Small clarification in "34.41. schemata")
Date
Msg-id 1378780046.14736.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Privileges for INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA (was Re: [DOCS] Small clarification in "34.41. schemata")  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 14:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >     pg_has_role(n.nspowner, 'USAGE')
> > >     OR has_schema_privilege(n.oid, 'CREATE, USAGE')
> > > 
> > > As things stand, a non-superuser won't see "public", "pg_catalog",
> > > nor even "information_schema" itself in this view, which seems a
> > > tad silly.
> > 
> > I agree it would make sense to change this.
> 
> Is this the patch you want applied?  The docs are fine? 

I have committed it with a documentation update.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database with LC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database with LC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII