Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?
Date
Msg-id 1377096247.99524.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:

> Yeah, I've been thinking about this a bit also and agree that 9.3
> is fine but not farther back.

+1 to 9.3 but no farther back.

I would be in favor of going farther back if there were not fairly
obvious workarounds for the OOM problems that lack of back-patch
could cause.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])