Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Date
Msg-id 1370844192.7746.32.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 01:28 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hm, note that XMAX_SHR_LOCK is two bits, so when that flag is present
> you will get the three lock modes displayed with the above code, which is
> probably going to be misleading.  htup_details.h does this:
> 
> /*
>  * Use these to test whether a particular lock is applied to a tuple
>  */
> #define HEAP_XMAX_IS_SHR_LOCKED(infomask) \
>     (((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_SHR_LOCK)
> #define HEAP_XMAX_IS_EXCL_LOCKED(infomask) \
>     (((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_EXCL_LOCK)
> #define HEAP_XMAX_IS_KEYSHR_LOCKED(infomask) \
>     (((infomask) & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) == HEAP_XMAX_KEYSHR_LOCK)
> 
> Presumably it'd be better to do something similar.

I was hesitant to do too much interpretation of the bits. Do you think
it would be better to just remove the test for XMAX_SHR_LOCK?

Regards,Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimising Foreign Key checks