Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brett McCormick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Date
Msg-id 13655.6758.220979.189918@abraxas.scene.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]  ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
They do it by having all children perform a "listen" on the socket..
would the ipc stuff function as usual in this case?  I'm not clear on
how the ipc stuff works.

On Mon, 11 May 1998, at 17:18:38, Maurice Gittens wrote:

> Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
> their
> implementation.
>
> Regards,
>     Maurice.
>
>
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Next
From: AliE@atlas.com
Date:
Subject: Is there any way to check the status of the Index table.