Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maurice Gittens
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Date
Msg-id 003e01bd7cf0$135b7cc0$fcf3b2c2@caleb..gits.nl
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]  (Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

>dg@illustra.com (David Gould) writes:
>> The idea that occurred to me is to have the postmaster
>> "pre-spawn" some servers in each (configurable) database. These would run
>> all the initialization and then just wait for a socket to be handed to
them.
>> The postmaster would during idle time replenish the pool of ready
servers.
>

Doesn't Apache do something similar? It should be easy enough to borrow
their
implementation.

Regards,
    Maurice.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] money or dollar type
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]