Re: Enabling Checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Enabling Checksums
Date
Msg-id 1359061421.601.39.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enabling Checksums  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Enabling Checksums
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 17:38 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> New version of checksums patch.

And another new version of both patches.

Changes:
 * Rebased.
 * Rename SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave to MarkBufferDirtyHint. Now that
it's being used more places, it makes sense to give it a more generic
name.
 * My colleague, Yingjie He, noticed that the FSM doesn't write any WAL,
and therefore we must protect those operations against torn pages. That
seems simple enough: just use MarkBufferDirtyHint (formerly
SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave) instead of MarkBufferDirty. The FSM
changes are not critical, so the fact that we may lose the dirty bit is
OK.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6510: A simple prompt is displayed using wrong charset