Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Date
Msg-id 13568.1102111325@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> The configuration is chosen in the config file for each member, rather 
> than being dictated centrally.

This is good.  Now what we need is a little cooperation among the
buildfarm team to make sure that the collective set of cases tested
covers all the interesting combinations of configure flags, as per
my followup ...

> A single member can run more than one branch, and per-branch config can 
> be set up. A single machine can run more than one farm member (e.g. to 
> use different compilers).

Yeah, on platforms where there's a non-gcc vendor compiler, testing with
the vendor compiler is very interesting.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: schmidtm
Date:
Subject: somebody working on: Prevent default re-use of sysids for dropped users and groups?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6