On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:13 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I do think that applying some kind of explicit flag to the function
> indicating whether it should allow implicit assignment
> casting/implicit casting to text/overloading/whatever is a possibly
> interesting alternative. It seems clear from our system catalogs that
> implicit casting to text is sometimes a desirable behavior and
> sometimes not, so it's reasonable to think that perhaps we should put
> that under user control. What I like about "my" proposal (really
> Tom's idea) is that it seems like it solves a pretty high percentage
> of the problem cases without requiring any explicit user action.
What user action are you concerned about? If we (eventually) made the
non-overloaded case the default, would that resolve your concerns?
Regards,Jeff Davis
