Re: WIP checksums patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: WIP checksums patch
Date
Msg-id 1349057360.15580.36.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to WIP checksums patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: WIP checksums patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:58 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> This is just a rebased version of the patch by Simon here:

I just noticed the following note in the docs for this patch:
 The default is <literal>off</> for backwards compatibility and to allow upgrade. The recommended setting is
<literal>on</>though this should not be enabled until upgrade is successfully complete with full set of new backups.
 

I don't understand what that means -- if they have the page_checksums
GUC available, then surely upgrade is complete, right? And what is the
backwards-compatibility issue?

Also, it looks out of date, because the default in guc.c is set to true.
I think we should probably default to true, because it's safer and it
can always be disabled at runtime, but I don't have a strong opinion
about that.

Regards,Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: gistchoose vs. bloat
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP checksums patch