Re: Caught up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Caught up
Date
Msg-id 1348496481-sup-5499@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Caught up  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of sáb sep 22 14:58:04 -0300 2012:
> On 3 September 2012 15:20, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> > On a related note, I apologize that many of these items didn't make it
> > into 9.2, though they are committed for 9.3.  The good news is that most
> > of my work was in documentation improvements and clarifications, that
> > could be backpatched to 9.2.  I did not bring this up earlier because I
> > didn't want to distract the work of making the improvements.
> >
> > If anyone wants to look at backpatching some of these doc changes into
> > 9.2, I will not object.  ;-)  I am attaching a partial list of doc
> > changes that might be considered.  (I need to improve my commit messages
> > that reference earlier commits by including the old commit tag;  my
> > apologies.)  No one has mentioned backpatching so perhaps these are all
> > too minor, which is fine.
>
> That's a huge number of amendments. Thanks for giving these some
> attention Bruce.

FWIW I tried to backpatch the changes listed by Bruce and they all seem
to apply fine to 9.2 so maybe we should do that -- I see no reason not
to.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Configuration include directory