Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date
Msg-id 13427.1171902011@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes  (Dimitri Fontaine <dim@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dim@dalibo.com> writes:
> You're both saying RAID/LVM implementations provide good enough performances 
> for PG not having to go this way, if I understand correctly.

There's certainly no evidence to suggest that reimplementing them
ourselves would be a productive use of our time.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: tomas@tuxteam.de
Date:
Subject: Re: New feature request: FlashBack Query
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes