Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Date
Msg-id 13382.1466350602@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Would this not result in unstable test output depending on whether the
>> code executes in the leader or a worker?

> Before doing that test, we set force_parallel_mode=1, so it should always
> execute in worker which will ensure a stable output.

No, it *might* execute in a worker.  If you can get one.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14199: The pg_ctl status check on server start is not compatible with the silent_mode=on