Re: Portable PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Portable PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 13351.1128316364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Portable PostgreSQL  (Samik Raychaudhuri <samik@freeshell.org>)
Responses Re: Portable PostgreSQL  (Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com)
Re: Portable PostgreSQL  (Samik Raychaudhuri <samik@freeshell.org>)
List pgsql-general
Samik Raychaudhuri <samik@freeshell.org> writes:
> ... What I wanted is a no-trace (or minimal trace), no-admin required
> kind of installation (I won't be able to create a non-admin user in the
> comp), which, when I am done, I can just delete the installation
> directory and will be clear.

Postgres isn't really designed to be the sort of "embedded" database
that you seem to be after.  You should look at other alternatives.
(Berkeley DB is one possibility that's written by friends of ours ;-))

In particular, you'll get zero sympathy here for any request to let the
database run as an admin-level user.  The IPC communication structure we
use does not allow restricting requests to just one program, and hence
ignoring security issues is simply not a sane thing to do.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling contrib module - intarray
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: pg_dump output mode