Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Does postgres intend to support all the different types of NaN? Does you
> intend to have +Inf and -Inf and underflow detection and all the other goodies
> you actually need to make it useful?
We have some of that; it needs work, and it's always going to be
dependent on the platform having proper IEEE support, but that's no
excuse to throw it away.
regards, tom lane
