On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 09:23 -0700, Scott Ribe wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Brian Weaver wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of pg_restore odd? If the default installation
since9.0 has PL/PgSQL installed then why does pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a developer
bytrade it smells like a bug.
>
> It's pg_dump that's emitting the command to create the language. If you ran pg_dump from 9.0+, it would not do so.
Not quite true. pg_dump from 9.0 does save the language definition, but
it uses the new CREATE OR REPLACE statement for languages, so that, when
you restore it in a 9.0+ database that already has the same language, it
won't complain with an error message.
BTW, it isn't odd that pg_dump 9.0 save the language definition. Having
by default the plpgsql language when you create a database doesn't mean
you can't drop it.
> This is an example of why the standard advice for upgrading is to use the newer pg_dump against the older database
Exactly.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
