Re: "could not accept SSPI security context" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From G_Hosa_Phat
Subject Re: "could not accept SSPI security context"
Date
Msg-id 1327096709495-5161800.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "could not accept SSPI security context"  (Ahmed Shinwari <ahmed.shinwari@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: "could not accept SSPI security context"
List pgsql-general
Ahmed wrote
>
> I tested the latest Npgsql driver (2.0.12.0), the issue has been fixed. I
> was able to connect Npgsql test application from my Windows XP client
> machine with the PostgreSQL server running on Windows 2003 Server.
>
> Thank you for applying the patch.
>
I've been trying to develop a new application in VB.NET (VS2008) against a
PostgreSQL 9.1.1 database server running on Windows Server 2008 using SSPI
authentication, and I'm running into this same error.  I've tried both
specifying the username and not specifying it in my
NpgsqlConnectionStringBuilder object, as well as trying to set or not set
the IntegratedSecurity property of the object (not setting it results in a
different error).  I was even looking for a property I could set to define
the user credentials (that's actually a whole different topic of discussion,
so we'll leave that alone for now).

I checked my version of Npgsql, and it's showing to be 2.0.11.0.  I tried
looking at the pgFoundry Web site and am unable to find a version 2.0.12.0
available.  Is this something that is still waiting for release, or am I
missing something?  If you require any additional details about this issue,
please let me know.

--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/could-not-accept-SSPI-security-context-tp3275102p5161800.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jerry Richards
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous?