Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences
Date
Msg-id 1327018412-sup-5856@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 20:53:42 -0300 2012:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 18:07:33 -0300 2012:
> >
> >> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document
> >> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than
> >> it appears to be at first glance.
> >
> > Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion.
>
> I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we
> really do want this behavior...?

Well, it documents what happened when we tried to do it.  Sort of like
"features we do not want".  But then, maybe it's just TODO bloat.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2