Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
Date
Msg-id 1315059883.11695.22.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2011-09-02 at 19:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The only one that's problematic is pg_regress.so; contrib modules are
> already installed in $libdir.  I still think that installing
> pg_regress.so in $libdir may be the most reasonable solution, assuming
> that the delta involved isn't too great.  Yeah, we would have to
> back-patch the changes into every release branch we want to test
> upgrading from, but how risky is that really?  The *only* thing it
> affects is the regression tests.

Or maybe make use of dynamic_library_path.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing