On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:08 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> On 07.07.2011 08:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:22 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> >> Aloha!
> >>
> >> I have been observing irregularities in the function statistics for some time. Now I have investigated and believe
tohave found the cause.
> >> Everything is here, including a proposed fix:
> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/325
> >>
> > The fix you propose requires from us to write a patch for PostgreSQL
> > (which won't be available to users before 9.2) for something we can
> > already do right into pgAdmin. Instead of filtering with the name of the
> > schema and the function, we should use its OID. This way, we could fix
> > 1.12, and 1.14 really quickly.
>
> Yeah, that's even better. Makes the query simpler, too.
> I was unsure whether funcid was known at the time of the query.
>
Fixed.
> I do wonder, however, why the function arguments, part of the function signature, would not be included in
pg_catalog.pg_stat_user_functions.
> Would you think this is worthy of a suggestion to the postgres people?
>
Might be. They could reply that you already have this information from
the pg_proc catalog.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
