Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Date
Msg-id 1305177756.10392.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On ons, 2011-05-11 at 18:36 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > Or you could just "unsetenv" instead of complaining.
> > 
> > +1 for that.
> 
> OK, the attached patch does this, but allows PGCLIENTENCODING to be
> passed in.  The new output looks like:
> 
>     Performing Consistency Checks
>     -----------------------------
>     ignoring libpq environment variable PGPORT

I haven't tried it, but I suppose option.c will now make use of PGPORT
and then later you get that message that it was ignored?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Infinity bsearch crash on Windows