On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:28 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:09:25 am Rafael Martinez wrote:
>
> Might want to take a look at:
>
[......]
> sequence). If, due to a short-term peak of log output rate, there are
> more than 3 * checkpoint_segments + 1 segment files, the unneeded
> segment files will be deleted instead of recycled until the system
> gets back under this limit."
>
Thank you.
This explains the number of WAL files generated, I was not aware of the
(3*checkpoint_segments + 1) limit (I will RTBM better next time)
But this doesn't explain the WAL files not been created/recycled
time-ordered. I wonder if this happened because the partition got full
while the WALs were created/recycled?
regards,
--
Rafael Martinez Guerrero
Center for Information Technology
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
