Re: Better estimates of index correlation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Date
Msg-id 1300069201.22696.2.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Better estimates of index correlation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Better estimates of index correlation
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 19:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm not planning to do anything about this idea right now, since I'm
> still hip-deep in collations, but I thought I'd throw it out to get
> it on the record.
> 
> Comments?

One question: Where is the overhead increase? 

JD

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Better estimates of index correlation
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Macros for time magic values