Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:58, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> They might not be using the same CVS programs, though. It appears that
>> Windows CVS (which, for example, red_bat uses) translates line endings to
>> CRLF, which is why it passed the regression tests, but MinGW CVS does not,
>> which I think is is why narwahl and vaquita failed and why dawn_bat will
>> probably fail next go round. brown_bat is on Cygwin and we should not expect
>> a change there.
> Yeah, I've seen a lot of weirdness with CVS clients on Windows doing
> that differently, so that also seems like a very likely reason.
brown_bat is indeed still green, so Andrew's probably fingered the right
component. I thought for a moment about insisting that Windows
buildfarm members use a non-translating CVS client, but that would still
leave people vulnerable when trying to build from source, if they use a
tarball extractor that converts newlines.
I'm thinking that the most appropriate fix is to have pg_regress
continue to use -w, but only on Windows. (I notice that ecpg is already
doing it that way, presumably for the same reason of newline
differences.) A filter such as Andrew mumbled about upthread seems like
more trouble than the problem is worth. Any actually-interesting
whitespace changes should get caught on other platforms.
regards, tom lane
