On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >
> > + else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME)
> > + snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
> > + "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point %
> s\n",
> > + (srcfd < 0) ? "" : "\n",
> > + parentTLI,
> > + xlogfname,
> > + recoveryStopAfter ? "after" :
> "before",
> > + recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint);
> >
> > It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point.
> After/Before
> > only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time.
> Removed.
> >
>
> you're right
Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing
with transaction or time." Why?
At present, I think the ability to stop before/after a named restore
point should be put back.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services