Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Date
Msg-id 1293651649-sup-8900@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié dic 29 16:29:45 -0300 2010:

> In practice I think it would make sense if heap_open accepts all
> relation types on which you can potentially do either a heapscan or
> indexscan (offhand those should be the same set of relkinds, I think;
> so this is the same in effect as Heikki's proposal, but phrased
> differently).  So it would have to start rejecting views, and we'd need
> to go looking for the consequences of that.

This seems a very good idea, but I think we shouldn't let it sink the
current patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions, patch v16