Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date
Msg-id 1291747502.31995.5.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
Responses Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 08:31 -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Command Prompt is currently considering writing a patch to provide
> > synonyms to PostgreSQL. Is this something the community is interested
> > in? Do we have use cases for it? MSSQL, DB2 and Oracle support them.
> >
>
> I must be missing something, but really, what's the point of synonyms?
>  What's the real-world use case for them?

For a PostgreSQL Person? I see no real benefit to be honest. For people
coming from Oracle, DB2 or MSSQL? I see a real benefit in terms of ease
of porting.

I asked on the Oracle free list[1] and Synonyms are used and used a lot
in Oracle. Anything we can do to help those folks run screaming from
err.... port to PostgreSQL seems like a good idea. (Assuming we can do
it reasonably)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

1. http://www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Synonyms

>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: if-clause to an exiting statement
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?