On tis, 2010-12-07 at 11:49 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> This is driving me nuts when working with PgJDBC via various ORM
> layers (I know, I know, but they're life at this point) that would
> work happily with these types if they were implicitly castable to/from
> strings, but don't understand how to explicitly specify these
> postgresql-specific types when talking to the JDBC layer.
Since that is a quite specific use case, why don't you add the casts
yourself?
