Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)
Date
Msg-id 1291231143.2368.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-11-30 at 14:20 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I agree, that argument is completely misconceived. If the DBA is
> paying enough attention to use LIMIT, s/he should be paying enough
> attention not to do damage in the first place. If that were the only
> argument in its favor I'd be completely against the feature.

I don't have any use for DELETE with LIMIT, but UPDATE with LIMIT could
be very useful if you are doing full-table updates and you don't have
enough space so you do it in chunks.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
Next
From: Alexey Klyukin
Date:
Subject: Re: Another proposal for table synonyms