Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Date
Msg-id 1288973294-sup-6389@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Jan Urbański's message of vie nov 05 04:19:07 -0300 2010:

> PS: I'm wondering if there's any noticable slowdown from always starting
> a subxact before doing SPI. Plperl users seemed not to notice, so I
> guess I shouldn't worry.

I think it's more "plperl users have to put up with it" rather than "not
notice".

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for seg picksplit function