On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >> (And, if we are going to break everything
> > in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to
> > something more flexible than one int32.)
>
> As someone who is jamming geometry type, spatial reference number and
> dimensionality into said 32bit typmod, let me say emphatically ...
> Amen!
So what kind of data structure would you like for a typmod?
